<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Revolting Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dannyrevolting.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dannyrevolting.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on My love of Slate, and the President that just wouldn&#8217;t go away. by On Slate &#171; Nothing&#8217;s News</title>
		<link>http://dannyrevolting.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/my-love-of-slate-and-the-president-that-just-wouldnt-go-away/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>On Slate &#171; Nothing&#8217;s News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannyrevolting.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/my-love-of-slate-and-the-president-that-just-wouldnt-go-away/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] Danny points to Slate as an example of good journalism online. I have to agree &#8212; Jacob Weisberg and company are very good at what they do. But isn&#8217;t it a little ironic that a publication so concerned with elite opinion is distributed in what&#8217;s supposed to be the most democratic medium? Sure they have blogs, slide shows, podcasts, and a message board. And they even allow comments &#8212; kind of. Otherwise, you&#8217;re talking about The New Republic. True or false? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Danny points to Slate as an example of good journalism online. I have to agree &#8212; Jacob Weisberg and company are very good at what they do. But isn&#8217;t it a little ironic that a publication so concerned with elite opinion is distributed in what&#8217;s supposed to be the most democratic medium? Sure they have blogs, slide shows, podcasts, and a message board. And they even allow comments &#8212; kind of. Otherwise, you&#8217;re talking about The New Republic. True or false? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My love of Slate, and the President that just wouldn&#8217;t go away. by uptown blogger</title>
		<link>http://dannyrevolting.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/my-love-of-slate-and-the-president-that-just-wouldnt-go-away/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>uptown blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 01:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannyrevolting.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/my-love-of-slate-and-the-president-that-just-wouldnt-go-away/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>----And he said it again in the middle of &quot;the path to 9-11,&quot; which was fitfully interrupted for a NON-POLITCAL speech by our real-life president. I was so incensed I stole your topic for a sec on my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;-And he said it again in the middle of &#8220;the path to 9-11,&#8221; which was fitfully interrupted for a NON-POLITCAL speech by our real-life president. I was so incensed I stole your topic for a sec on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
